
This beery weekend was finally the day of the long-planned Y.m.p. APA, of which the crafting consumed the majority of Saturday night while Mrs. BOV oversaw the very imp hisself. Whilst prepping for the brew day (read: “cleaning”,) I got a chance to fit in a beer I strongly suspect will be available on Aug 25th. As well, after a lovely Sunday stroll w/ Mrs BOV & Imp, I finally got to drink an excellent limited offering from one of my favorite left-coast breweries, Lagunitas (h.t. Pete B for alerting, and Mike at Coles for stocking it.) All that and some yard-work, too.
Ok, a quick rundown on the homebrew. Young Master Phineas, who began living among us on Nov 30th, was born a hefty 9 pounds and 4 ounces- And being the pathetic beer-minded dad I am, I immediately thought it was a good total grist weight for a brew. “Grist”, if you’re unfamiliar with the term, is simply what you call all the malted barley, wheat, and whatever else you might be deriving flavor and fermentables from during the mashing portion of the brew. I finally got down and hammered out a recipe, something a lot like this:
5 lbs. American (Breiss) 6-row pale; 1.5-2L
3 lbs. British (Fawcett) Optic 2-row pale; 2.1L
.33 lbs German (Weyermann) Melanoidin malt; 22-32L
.33 lbs British (Fawcett) malted wheat; 2L
.33 lbs British (Fawcett) crystal rye; 70-80L
3 oz American (Breiss) crystal malt; 40L
1 oz German (Weyermann?) chocolate rye (400-500L)
(plus- who knew?) 1lb Billingtons muscavado sugar at end of boil
====
1.5 oz Palisades 8.5AA @ 60
1 oz Palisades 8.5AA @ 30
.5 oz Palisades 8.5AA @ 10 + irish moss
.5 oz Palisades 8.5AA @ flame-off
====
Wyeast 1332 (Northwest Ale) Atten 67-71%; Flocc high; temp 65-75
====
O.G. 1.052
IBU 63
Color ~9 SRM
ABV ~4.8%
So, mashed to some John Zorn (Naked City), keeping it at 156 degrees early, slowly falling to a final temp of 152 over the 1.25h period. After recirculation & lautering, I drew off a 4 gallon kettle for boil– and my first misfortune, fear of underconversion. The gravity as I started was already only about 15 Brix (= ~1.060; yes, I use a refractometer), wasn’t bad, but after the full run-off, then boiling, then adding to 2-3 gallons water for the final 5 gal total… I knew I was off already. Still, nice sparge, no sticking, by the end of the run-off it was measuring 5 Brix (= ~1.020). Began the boil to Rush’s Signals and started dropping in the Palisade hop plugs. Note: if using whole leaf or plugs, use bags! I lost a lot of kettle volume to these leaves, and I guess that’s one huge difference from pellets, my mainstay for years. Also, for shits & giggles, with about 5 min left to go in the boil, I dropped in a pound of sugar- I had some muscavado in my brewing cupboard, it wasn’t getting any fresher, so heck: call it one to grow on! Finished the hour boil and hop schedule to some Spoon (Kill The Moonlight) while chilling with the immersion chiller- I was even used my double-coil design with initial chilling stage because the groundwater was coming out a balmy 60. The wort (i.e., unfermented beer) dropped to below 90 in about half an hour, and then it was into the 6.5 gallon carboy for primary, along with filtered water to make to total volume, approximately five gallons. O.G.? Oh, right: I am a total farking idiot. I forgot to take the original or starting gravity. No, I just went ahead and pitched the yeast and went to bed. It was late. It is what it is.
I’ve had it in the fermentation chiller at 68 degrees, it’s getting there but of course, fermentation is exothermic, and so until the primary calms down, it’s sort of an uphill battle- it’s at 72 right now, and burbling through the airlock in a pleasing way. Here it is:
OK, so now for the beers. Sorry to drag you non-brewers through all that, but perhaps it whets your appetite to at least know more about what goes into beer, if not get into the hobby. I should take a moment to plug Niagara Traditions and the NAH, who will be at the Brewfest doing a demo, as usual.
The first of these two beers, pictured below, is from Southern Tier of Lakewood NY. They’ll be at the Brewfest, and I’d be completely unsurprised if they’re rocking both this one and its “younger brother”, Hop Sun. I’m talking, of course, about the beer Paul mentioned in the Beer-O-Vision interview from the Goodbeer Club: über*sun, an Imperial Wheat Ale. And it has the specs to back that up: 8% abv, starting at 18 degrees Plato. It is light, at only 5 Lovibond, and lists the ingredients as only 2-row malted barley, wheat malt, and Centennials in the kettle and as dry hops. Simplicity, in this case, is not without some danger. Where do you put the alcohol?
Obviously, it pours out like liquid sun indeed, a haze-free golden shine: The stuff just about gives off light. Sitting atop, a fluffy head is reinforced with wheat proteins. While it doesn’t maintain, it does leave beautiful lacing all the way down the tall glass; very nice. At 40 degrees, the aroma combines a good dose of citrusy Centennials with some of the breadyness of honeywheat and no mistaking it, some alcohol. I find the aroma overall very ‘open,’ somehow. The flavor mixes a tingly hopsbitter beginning with a lightly sweet and slightly dusty middle coming to a finish that is a bit of a whack of hops and fusel-alcohol. Honestly, I get a bit derailed at the end of this beer, and I wonder if a different bittering hop might have played better with this grain bill, or if maybe a different yeast might have softened the hops finish. In the end, I think the alcohol x hops interaction sort of nudges this beer out of balance for my palate. However, it’s hard to hide alcohol in as light a beer as this, of course. I’m thinking that the wheat dimension didn’t overcome the overuse of hops, meant to, themselves, overcome the alcohol, perhaps.
On to number two…
I discovered Lagunita’s while living in Tucson, and am so very glad it has reached WNY in terms of availability. This bottle, which we split over a plate of loaded fries, came to a couple of very thirsty people (and highly anticipated by one of them on a recommendation from a beery friend in San Francisco). Especially cool was the label- yes, nice artwork, but in the blurb, they make mention of a trio of brewing greats, though not by name. You don’t have to be too well-versed in American microbrewing lore, however, to identify that they’re naming Sierra Nevada, Anchor, and Rogue as their holy trinity of brewing inspiration, and you know what- I think they’re spot-on when it comes to some of the critical early innovators of craft brewing going way back.
For their 13th anniversary beer, they threw down a malt-driven imperial red ale, and it’s a winner. It pours out, as can be seen, with a sincere copper tone, and some red highlights in the depths of the glass- crystal malts, perhaps? There’s a nearing-chunky head, but its not going to stick around- the alcohol (8.3 abv) will see to that, though it laced the glass well. In the nose, you are confronted with some fierce malt, tinged with some yeasty floral nods; the combination gives just a notion of dark fruit to it. Alongside, hops, mainly piney and earthy, operate in the top-end. Particle-man beats Triangle-man on this one- aroma goes to malt. How about flavor? It’s oily from the get-go, but as the bitterness spreads back along the tongue, the malt character comes to the fore nicely with brown sugar, slight date, and toast. I wonder about rye, and I have a pause about oats because the mouthfeel is so solid, chewy, owing also to medium-low carbonation. The finish is sluggish, deliciously, earthy, peppery, bittery so, pretty much obliterating the middle and going down the throat with a trace of warmth. Triangle victorious! For a beer with this level of complexity, this is remarkably easy to drink. It’s sort of what I wish their Brown Shugga was, actually. As a match to fries with cheese and bacon bits, it worked very well, and I have to recommend it. It might also stand to aging, if you were into that.
So, there you go, two beers >4U








5 users commented in " One Weekend, One Brew- And Two Beers "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackActually, truth be told, I found the brewing description to be a much more illuminating read than a beer review. Not this particular review, but, umm, beer reviews in general. It is a constant problem with me and such things - reading about beer without one (esp. the beer in question) in front of you doesn’t end up making a whole lot of sense to me.
I’ve pushed you on video podcasts before, but I think a totally cool audio podcast would be an interactive beer review. “This week we’re checking out Hop Devil. Go find some before proceeding with this program. Got one in front of you? Good… first,” etc. I’d be bugging you for a new one weekly. Perhaps daily. Not much we could do about local breweries/brewpubs, but others? Hmm.
Also, on that note, Beer-O-Vision is currently geared towards those who know a bit or two. You might care to acknowledge that there are those who’ve picked up a thing or two from having beer-obsessed friends (anyone we know?). But most importantly the third group: those who know nothing, but might be interested in learning more.
Before I found BeerAdvocate’s “Beer 101″ on their site, I was really a bit left out of Finer Beer Appreciation. I think half of that is encouraged by beer aficionados. The other is forgetting that the set of terms and qualifications that a reviewer uses are alien to beer newcomers.
That said, is your goal to educate the masses? Or carry the ones who are already on the same page along with you? As you have often expressed that Beer Appreciation is something you want to spread to the uninformed masses, well, welcome them into your fold with open arms. It may require some hand-holding.
Well, Jim… that’s a lot to chew on for one comment.
re. reviews- well, essentially, if you get a description of the beer that’s enough for you to decide it’s a beer you’d try (or one you wouldn’t), then that’s as good as a review gets. Beyond that, they are little exercises in prose poetry as well- how many ways can you describe very similar things? They’re impressionistic, more than photographic.
The podcast idea is excellent- time, time, time, though, and it’s only about to get shorter once ye olde semester begins. Still, one to keep in my pocket alright.
As far as the last three paragraphs go… I want to reach all of those audiences, certainly. ONe modicum of interactivity happens here, in the comments- if I’m unclear, I can be approached for another go-round; we can also go to the next level. So I sort of hope to lay something out there as it is and let the comments direct the course thereafter.
That is also why I’m into heavy linkage, though I’d love to have even more- time again.
At the same time, I’ve thought for a while about a separate page with a BOV glossary or primer, as but one place links could go to (instead, I’m a heavy referrer to Wikipedia, which I can pretty much say is on-target for the subjects I send off to).
So, I don’t know, there’s some reply! Given my background, I’m totally into education, but at the same time, I would like to have an audience that I am not always (or just) teaching to, either- I’m a life learner as much as any sort of instructor; once you think you know it all, you know all you will, that’s certain.
Hmm. OK.
Time is always an issue. I am unfairly unsympathetic with my working too much and assorted creative tasks. However, I am also sans child, so much more of my time is mine.
It appears that I have to move out there sooner than I thought - with our tendency to find ourselves enjoying a beer it wouldn’t be too tough to also stick a microphone in front of your face.
As far as your audience goes, well, I still say one thing that keeps potential converts out (or hesitant, as I was) is uncertainty about what one is reading. Perhaps an avenue to explore is putting those little floaty things - like inline advertising - in your texts, but instead of getting a beer ad when you mouse over a term, you get a pop-up definition. Mouse over, say, cask conditioned, and you get to find out what it’s all about (though that one may require a link, as all my research has dug up multiple meanings. huh?).
You avoid one of BeerAdvocate’s major failings: badmouthing less interesting beer and therefore making a potential good-beer-convert feel like a moron because s/he does, in fact, enjoy their MGD. Smart move. However, I wonder if it is at the risk of assuming that your audience is on the same page as a beer aficionado… which could potentially alienate them if finding an access point is confounding.
I suggest only that despite the drudgery of didactic entries or components, inviting people on board by opening it up may bring you a wider audience.
How long did it take you to brew that beer? I’ve been kicking around the idea of buying a homebrew kit from Niagara Traditions and I want to know how much of a time commitment I am getting myself into. Is this an all day affair or something which can be done in the course of an afternoon?
After all, if the wife isn’t down for 8 hours of brewing in the basement, I might as well stick to golfing and drinking bottled microbrews.
Tom,
You can brew in much shorter time, if you stick with using malt extract and adding specialty grains for flavor/complexity. This means you skip the mash and get your fermentables from a can of malt extract or from powdered malt extract instead of deriving them from grains. Some homebrewers will get all snobby on ya if you don’t do all-grain, but I say to each their own, and I know that extract brews routinely win in competitions- quality has more to do with careful procedures than from using grain. So if time is an issue, you cut down the brew day to about 3-4h including prep and cleanup. NIagara will hook you up with the intro equipment and ingredients for your first brew for $79.00.
‘Couse, a recent issue of one the brewing magazines focussed on making really small batches- like a six-pack or a gallon at a time. In this case, you can have a 2h brew day, apparently. I’m anxious to try it sometime, actually.
Leave A Reply